Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wrexham & Shropshire Route (diagram) (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrexham & Shropshire Route (diagram) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a confusing one. It started life as Wrexham & Shropshire Route. It was put for deletion. The consensus was for merge with Wrexham & Shropshire. Well Gwen Gale felt as though there wasn't enough content to merge with the main article, so she deleted it. Well just before the first AfD started, Mpvide65 created a template (Template:Wrexham & Shropshire Route) that contained the information that was in the route article. On July 4th, that template was nominated for deletion. Mpvide65 then immediately moved the template to Wrexham & Shropshire Route (diagram). So now we're basically back where we started. I ran into this because I was about to delete the template per a template for deletion. This Wrexham & Shropshire Route (diagram) article actually has less content than the original deleted article had. It's still essentially just a template with a very small lead paragraph. I don't personally have an opinion here. I'm just presenting this because this needs to be resolved one way or another. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:07, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - all the info here is duplicated in Wrexham & Shropshire. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Forgot to mention that if this is deleted the template needs to be deleted as well. Right now it exists as just a redirect at Template:Wrexham & Shropshire Route. --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:11, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. The outcome at TfD for the template was delete; the creation of this article seems to be a blatant attempt to sidestep such a decision, not to mention an earlier AfD concensus. In any case, we certainly don't need a whole article for a train route diagram. PC78 (talk) 11:16, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G4 (recreation of deleted material) per PC78 (assuming Woohookitty is correct about its being essentially the same). Olaf Davis | Talk 17:43, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 20:55, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete -- this adds nothign to what already exists in Wrexham & Shropshire. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.